Our analytics are built on independent event data and can differ slightly from official FPL figures. Why?
vs 42 qualifying EPL CAMs · min 50' (10% of minutes played) · 26/27
Full explanation| Match | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 7.4 | |
| W | Nottingham Forest(A)EFL | 0 | - | 0 | - | - |
| D | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 6.6 | |
| D | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 7.1 | |
| L | Chelsea(A)EFL | 0 | - | 0 | - | - |
| W | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | 6.7 | |
| D | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.2 | 6.5 | |
| Last 5 league total | 1+0.5 | 0.5 | 0-0.4 | 0.4 |
Verdict: Strong volume + good finishing → form is sustainable.
Hover any trait to see how it is calculated
See all percentilesEach bar is a percentile against other attacking midfielders.
Tap any trait to see how it is calculated
See all percentiles| SPLIT | APPS | GOALS | xG | SHOTS/90 | SOT/90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | 5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
| Home | |||||
| Away | |||||
| vs Big 6 | |||||
| vs Top 5 | |||||
| vs Bottom 6 |
